The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a police officer who forcibly removed a protester conducting a sit-in on the Vermont House floor a decade ago is entitled to qualified immunity. The ruling was unsigned but appeared to split 6-3 along ideological lines, with the liberal justices in dissent. They voted to let the case proceed to trial. The case stems from a…
Supreme Court backs officer seeking immunity from Vermont House protester’s excessive force claims
Originally reported by The Hill. Read the full story at the original source.
Related Articles
Cornyn predicts post-midterms will be ‘most miserable two years’ of Trump’s life
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) predicted in a new interview that the two years after the November midterm elections will be ...
Kennedy Center board appeals order to remove Trump’s name from building
The Kennedy Center board of trustees on Thursday appealed a federal judge’s order to remove President Trump’...
Federal lawsuit filed to block New York’s Medical Aid in Dying law
Disability rights organizations have filed a federal lawsuit in New York to block the Medical Aid in Dying law, arguing ...
Chris Mason: Dissent fizzes again at the top of the Labour Party
Chris Mason: Dissent fizzes again at the top of the Labour Party15 minutes agoShareSaveAdd as preferred on GoogleChris M...