The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a police officer who forcibly removed a protester conducting a sit-in on the Vermont House floor a decade ago is entitled to qualified immunity. The ruling was unsigned but appeared to split 6-3 along ideological lines, with the liberal justices in dissent. They voted to let the case proceed to trial. The case stems from a…
Supreme Court backs officer seeking immunity from Vermont House protester’s excessive force claims
Originally reported by The Hill
Related Articles
Sunday shows preview: VRA ruling fuels redistricting battle; Iran war crosses 60 days
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the Voting Rights Act has triggered a fast-moving redistricting fight across the So...
Duffy: Iran war ‘was not the impetus’ for Spirit shutting down amid rising fuel prices
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy rebuffed the suggestion that Spirit Airlines was forced to shut down as a result of ...
Stop families who choose not to work getting unlimited benefits, Tories say
Stop families who choose not to work getting unlimited benefits, Tories say59 minutes agoShareSaveAdd as preferred on Go...
‘Shock and share’: Iran makes social media a key front in war against America
Sassy comebacks, sarcastic insults and glossy AI-generated videos have all been key tools in Iran’s retaliation against ...