Nancy Dillon
Contact Nancy Dillon on X Contact Nancy Dillon by Email View all posts by Nancy Dillon August 12, 2026
Marilyn Manson on July 06, 2026 in Seville, Spain. Bianca de Vilar/Getty Images A Los Angeles County judge granted a trial date Wednesday to the woman who claims Marilyn Manson sexually assaulted her at his West Hollywood home studio in 2010 and later subjected her to physical and emotional abuse when she worked as his assistant.
At a court hearing, Judge Steve Cochran noted the case had “traveled a windy road” after it was first filed in 2021 and then dismissed and revived twice. He said he was willing to grant an expedited date if plaintiff Ashley Walters wanted one. When Walters’ lawyer requested a date in November of next year, he quickly set the case for a jury trial on Nov. 15, 2027. While that date might not sound expedited, it’s relatively fast for the county, where new trials are routinely being set for mid-2028.
“We’re confident the case will never get to trial after the court hears our upcoming motion for summary judgment,” the musician’s lawyer, Howard King, said in a statement after the hearing.
In her lawsuit, Walters alleges Manson, whose real name is Brian Warner, pushed her onto a bed in May 2010, pinned her arms, and tried to kiss her before moving behind her, biting her ear, and forcing her hand into his underwear. She says she later accepted a job as his assistant after he suggested they could collaborate professionally. She claims he went on to whip her, throw plates at her, force her to stand on a chair for long periods, and hurl her into a wall during drug-fueled rages.
The long-running case has survived multiple challenges by Warner. A different judge dismissed it as untimely in May 2022, but an appellate panel later revived it, allowing Walters to try to show that trauma-induced memory suppression delayed her filing. Judge Cochran dismissed the case again in December 2025 after finding Walters failed to make that showing.
But Cochran reversed that decision in January after Walters invoked a new California law, AB 250, that opened a two-year window for certain previously time-barred sexual assault claims. In June, Cochran rejected Warner’s latest effort to dismiss or narrow Walters’ third amended complaint.
Editor’s picks
The 250 Greatest Albums of the 21st Century So Far
The 100 Best TV Episodes of All Time
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
100 Best Movies of the 21st Century
Warner’s lawyers argued Walters’ allegations did not qualify for revival under AB 250 because she could not show she was physically restrained during the alleged sexual touching. Cochran said the dispute was too fact-specific to resolve at the pleading stage and allowed the case to proceed, leaving Warner free to challenge the claims later.