Brendan Carr. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images In a fiery legal filing to the Federal Communications Commission Thursday, ABC submitted early renewal applications for its eight owned and operated local TV stations, though the Disney-owned broadcaster noted that it was doing so “under protest.”
“The Commission had not demanded early renewal in over five decades. And it has never before demanded simultaneous license renewal applications from a group of stations commonly owned with a network as it has here,” the filing, from the network’s flagship WABC New York, states. “The Order has no legitimate purpose.”
Related Stories
TV Trump Celebrates Colbert's Exit From CBS, Says of Other Late Night Hosts, "May They All Rest in Peace!"
TV NBC Wins TV Season in Total Viewers for the First Time Since 2002
ABC argues that the FCC, under chairman Brendan Carr, was attempting to “suppress speech under the guise of bureaucratic process.”
ABC cites the timing of the request, which came days after ABC late night host Jimmy Kimmel came under sharp criticism from President Trump, who demanded he be fired over a joke he made about First Lady Melania Trump.
“The timing of the Order makes the retaliatory purpose unmistakable,” the filing states. “The Order suddenly emerged the day after public calls for punitive action in response to comments made during ABC Network programming.”
In addition to Kimmel, the FCC has also targeted The View, the daytime panel show, suggesting that it may have run afoul of its equal opportunity provision for political candidates.
The FCC has said that the early license renewal is about Disney’s DEI practices, not its programming,
Instead, the network says that the ultimate loser in this fight will be TV viewers, who will lose the accountability reporting and independent journalism that the current system delivers.
“The ultimate injury here is not to the Station or its parent company. It is to the public,” the filing states. “When a broadcaster must weigh regulatory retaliation before making editorial decisions, the public loses access to journalism that is free from government influence. The Order—both on its own terms and as a signal to other broadcasters—advances exactly that result. A press that edits itself to avoid government displeasure is not a free press. The Commission should not be the instrument of that outcome.”
And the extraordinary nature of the request, focused not on just a single station but a whole network of them, is a part of that toolkit, ABC argues:
“Simultaneously forcing every station in a media company’s portfolio to file premature license renewal applications is not a regulatory tool,” the filing states. “It is an extraordinary demonstration of power and coercion directed at disfavored editorial voices, which sends a clear warning to every broadcaster in America. This is a threat to the First Amendment that this Commission and this proceeding must not be permitted to normalize.”
THR Newsletters
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day
Subscribe Sign Up
